![]() Our hospital and provided their signed informed consent document. Syndromes Registry (Registro de Síndromes Coronarianas Agudas - RESCA) of ![]() The patients who participated in this study were part of the Acute Coronary In this hospital cohort, with regard to in-hospital death prediction, theĭiscriminatory ability and calibration of the TIMI score was compared to those of Of the Acute Coronary Syndromes Registry (RESCA) and were admitted with thisĬondition. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, we studied the individuals who were part To determine which of the two scores has better performance in patients with Therefore, the TIMI scoreįor ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction 6 comprises variables that are more specific for this clinical These clinical conditions, validated in distinct samples. On the other hand, the TIMI score has distinct models for each of Thus, the same score is used inīoth conditions. The former clinical condition was predominant in the sample 2. The GRACE score was derived from a sample composed of a combination of patients withĪCS without ST-segment elevation and patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial The two models has better prognostic performance with regard to in-hospital With ST-segment elevation myocardial infraction it has not been established which of Patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation, and it wasĮvident that the GRACE score had better prognostic accuracy. Others 4, 5 have previously compared these two scores in In this context, the main risk scores have been Risk estimates have implicationsįor clinical management, particularly with regard to broad-spectrum diseases, suchĪs acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The individual probability of unwanted outcomes. Risk scores correspond to multivariate models used in clinical practice to estimate
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |